Legal Opinion
Hitkansut LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 11, 2016No. 12-303CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Patent case; pre-trial motions in limine
OPINION AND ORDER
Charles F. Lettow, Judge
Pending before the court in this patent case are six motions in limine filed by plaintiffs (“Hitkansut”) and one motion in limine filed by the United States (“government”), each seeking to exclude evidence from the trial scheduled to begin May 23, 2016. The motions have been fully briefed, and oral argument is unnecessary to their resolution.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs (collectively “Hitkansut”) assert that their licensor, Ms. Donna Walker, invented
a unique method for improving the mechanical and physical properties of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hitkansut LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Meridian Mfg., Inc. v. C&B Mfg., Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2018
- Foxx v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Acme Worldwide Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.