Rapp v. Spring Valley Gold Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County, and from an order refusing' a hew trial. The facts, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Judgment for plaintiffs was entered upon a stipulation. The sole question is whether the plaintiffs should have been allowed an attorney’s fee.
1. The first position of the appellants is, that the stip^ ulation waived the attorney’s fee. The material portion of the stipulation is as follows: “ Plaintiffs shall reduce their claims to judgment in the following manner: Said Gregory, in conjunction with Mr. N. S. Walker, Jr., vice-president of the company, shall immediately, or as soon as they can, ascertain and fix. 'the amount due to each of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Estate of DoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Bank of Woodland v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Bonds v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Carriere v. MinturnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by25 opinions
- Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Mulcahy v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.