Legal Opinion
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Flores-Galarza
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided May 15, 2002No. CIV. 01-1894CCCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CEREZO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Co. (collectively UPS), challenge Puerto Rico’s statutory scheme prohibiting them from making deliveries to any recipient of a package (“consignee”) that has not obtained a certificate from the Department of the Treasury authorizing the delivery. Plaintiffs also challenge the alternate mechanism that allows them to take possession of the packages and deliver them to the recipient, subject to complying with a comprehensive set of regulations and conditions that impact their operations.
Beca…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Flores-GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Flores-GalarzaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2003
- NEW HAMPSHIRE MOTOR TRANSPORT ASS'N v. RoweDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
- New Hampshire Motor Transport Ass'n v. RoweDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Flores-GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004