Legal Opinion

United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Flores-Galarza

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 4, 2003No. 02-1621, 02-1792PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Circuit Judge.

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico has enacted a statutory regime that prohibits an interstate air carrier from delivering any package unless the carrier first provides proof that the package’s addressee has paid the appropriate excise tax, or the carrier prepays the amount of the tax on the addressee’s behalf. Plaintiffs United Parcel Service, Inc., and United Parcel Service, Co., (collectively “UPS”) persuaded the district court to enjoin the Commonwealth’s Treasury Secretary from enforcing these delivery restrictions on the grounds of federal preemption. The parties have…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Kevin W. Tobin v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. Torres-Rosado v. Rotger-SabatCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  3. Harrington v. American AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  4. Branche v. Airtran Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Jackson v. CoalterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API