Legal Opinion
CREEKRIDGE TOWNHOME OWNERS ASSN., INC. v. C. Scott Whitten, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 1, 2009No. C058300, C059458PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
This is a construction defect case involving the reroofing of 11 buildings that house 61 units in a townhome community. The trial court granted summary judgment to the roofing defendants. The trial court found that the plaintiff townhome association did not meet the statute of limitations because the association had notice of a water moisture problem inside the window of one unit as a result of the new roof, and this unit reported several broken roof tiles.
We shall reverse. We conclude there are triable issues of material fact on the two statute of limitations issues; (1)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Wiener v. Southcoast Childcare Centers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2004
- Flait v. North American Watch Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- North Coast Business Park v. Nielsen Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brisbane Lodging, L.P. v. Webcor Builders, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- The LUCKMAN PARTNERSHIP, INC. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Delon Hampton & Associates, Chartered v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Kabat v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- LTL Commercial v. Hammer IRP LTL Assoc. CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.