Legal Opinion
The LUCKMAN PARTNERSHIP, INC. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 25, 2010No. B215298PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARMSTRONG, J.
Darrell D. Ramsey (Ramsey) and Chenel Ramsey, husband and wife, sued The Luckman Partnership, Inc., for negligence and loss of consortium. After Luckman’s motion for summary judgment was denied, it filed a petition for writ of mandate. We issued an alternative writ concluding that plaintiffs’ claims were barred by the four-year statute of limitations and/or the 10-year statute of repose (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 337.1, subd. (a), 337.15, subd. (a)), and because subsequent design and construction constituted an independent intervening cause.
The trial court declined to comply…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Preston v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Jazayeri v. MaoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Martinez v. Pacific BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Martinez v. TraubnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Greenspan v. LADT LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People ex rel. Owen v. Media One Direct, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Thorstrom v. ThorstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Delon Hampton & Associates, Chartered v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014