Legal Opinion
McCann v. Rosenblum
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 2014No. SC S062082, S062083, S062084PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
In this consolidated ballot title case, three sets of petitioners have asked us to review the ballot title for Initiative Petition 47 (2014). See ORS 250.085(2) (specifying who may petition for review of certified ballot titles). We review ballot titles for substantial compliance with ORS 250.035(2). See ORS 250.085(5) (stating standard of review). For the reasons explained below, we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification.
Initiative Petition 47 (IP 47), if enacted, would change the way that liquor is sold in Oregon. Currently, the Oregon Liquor Control Commission…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Qwest Corp. v. City of SurpriseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Automobile Club v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Wolf v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- McCann / Harmon v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rogue Valley Sewer Services v. City of PhoenixOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. City of GreshamOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Nearman/Miller v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Vaandering v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- W. States Petroleum Ass'n v. Envtl. Quality Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.