Legal Opinion

Wright v. Nothnagel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, C. J.

On December 4, 1934, the plaintiff, Mary E. Wright, obtained a decree foreclosing a second mortgage on a 220-acre tract of land in Union county, Oregon. These lands, in separate parcels, were at the time subject to first mortgages held by the Oregon State Land Board, which mortgages were likewise foreclosed and, pursuant to decrees therein entered, all said lands were sold to satisfy said first mortgages. In each of said suits so brought by the State Land Board, the plaintiff herein was 'made a party defendant and served with summons but she failed to appear and default decrees were entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wright v. WimberlyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Lutz v. Blackwell Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Marshall v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Bruckman v. HealyOregon Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Family Bank of Commerce v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Banteir v. HarrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Ward v. Beem CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Sumner v. Enercon Development CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Sumner v. Enercon Development Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API