Legal Opinion

Bruckman v. Healy

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is a suit to foreclose two mortgages on a .quarter section of land in Marion County, known as the Breitenbush Hot Springs property. On April 21, 1924, defendant Healy executed a mortgage in favor of Gale S. Hill and Emily G. Ward, on an undivided two-thirds interest in the above property, to secure the payment of two promissory notes of even date, one in the sum of $9,000 maturing July 11, 1926, and the other for $19,500 due July 11, 1928. The other mortgage which is the basis of the second cause of suit was executed by defendant Healy on April 25, 1924, in favor of A. L. Mansfield,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. WimberlyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Caro v. WollenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Bank of British Columbia v. PageOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Griswold v. StoughtonOregon Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Balfour v. BurnettOregon Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. J. H. Morris, Inc. v. Indian Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Ulrich v. Lincoln Realty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Nebraska Land Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Wright v. NothnagelOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Title & Trust Co. v. Security Buildings Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API