Legal Opinion

Family Bank of Commerce v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 1985No. 83-474-NJ-3; CA A31307PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Plaintiff brought an action for the judicial foreclosure of a trust deed and a deficiency judgment. Before trial, plaintiff moved to amend its complaint to be an action on the note secured by the trust deed. The trial court denied the motion to amend and granted a decree of foreclosure, but not a deficiency judgment. Plaintiff appeals and assigns as error the denial of the motion. We reverse. 1

In March, 1982, defendant signed a promissory note to extend a loan made by plaintiff to defendant. The note was secured by a trust deed on defendant’s duplex. When the note was signed, the duplex was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weatherly v. HochfeldOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. COLONIAL LEASING CO., NEW ENG., INC. v. TracyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Jesse Et Ux. v. Birchell Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Banteir v. HarrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Ward v. Beem CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davis v. Tennessee Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Alfieri v. SolomonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Franke v. Oregon Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Arter v. SpathasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Barclaysamerican/Financial, Inc. v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API