Legal Opinion

Ward v. Beem Corporation

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1968PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is a suit in which plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment pronouncing that defendants’ second mortgage and the indebtedness supporting it were legally discharged by previous foreclosure proceedings. Defendants appeal from a decree granting plaintiffs’ prayer for relief.

Plaintiffs purchased Cavalier Lodge in Roseburg from The Beem Corporation. As consideration for the transfer plaintiffs assumed a first mortgage on the property, transferred certain property in Fresno, California, and signed five notes totaling $43,365 secured by a second mortgage which is conceded to be a purchase money…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Page v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Wright v. WimberlyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Stretch v. MurphyOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Lutz v. Blackwell Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Marshall v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Family Bank of Commerce v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Banteir v. HarrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Beckhuson v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Emco Investment, Inc. v. VadenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Sumner v. Enercon Development Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API