Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Blackwell Et Ux.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an action by the payee of a promissory note to secure judgment against the maker for the face thereof. The controversy is before us upon an appeal by the defendants from a judgment rendered upon a demurrer to the answer. The complaint averred a copy of the note, its maturity and its nonpayment; it prayed for judgment. The answer admitted the execution of the note; it alleged that its consideration was the purchase price of some real property; that its payment was secured by a mortgage upon that property secondary to a prior mortgage. It further alleged that the holder of the latter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Page v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Wright v. WimberlyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Williams v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Oregon Mill & Grain Co. v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Hicks v. Peninsula Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stretch v. MurphyOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Call v. JeremiahOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Ward v. Beem CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Walter v. TurtleOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Sumner v. Enercon Development CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API