Kershner v. Prudential Insurance

JOHNSON, Judge:

In this appeal we are asked to decide whether the trial court committed error in granting a directed verdict. Finding the directed verdict to have been granted upon grounds *97outside the boundaries of the controversy as defined by the parties’ stipulations, we reverse and remand.

Kathleen Carter Kershner, appellant, brought an action against her no-fault automobile insurer, the Prudential Insurance Company, for medical expenses and lost wages alleged to be due her under the personal injury protection provisions of her policy. Kershner had carried auto insurance with Prudential…