Legal Opinion

Parsonese v. Midland National Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1998No. 64 E.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Chief Judge.

This appeal challenges the constitutionality of the retroactive application of a statute affecting life insurance contracts. The trial court held that, if applied retroactively, the statute would violate the contracts clause of the state and federal constitutions by impairing the life insurance contract at issue in this case. Accordingly, the court did not apply the statute, but enforced the life insurance contract without its modification by the statute.

The case was tried in the court of common pleas on stipulated facts and issues filed pursuant to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sveen v. MelinSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Hill v. DeWittSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. Moorhead v. Crozer Chester Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. RizzutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Kerns v. Methodist HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API