Lynch v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
The refusal of motions for a judgment non obstante veredicto or, in the alternative, a new trial in an as*420sumpsit action based upon a life insurance policy is challenged on this appeal.
Important to a determination of one phase of this appeal, a recital of certain facts is necessary.
Jarman Lynch (Lynch), 21 years of age and with a very limited educational background, in the early part of 1958 noticed a “fullness in his right testicle”. On August 25, 1958, he consulted a doctor who referred him to the University of Pennsylvania Surgical Clinic which he attended, first…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Nyce v. MuffleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Shafer v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Board of Public Education v. WatsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Brandon v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Banas v. Matthews International Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Metts v. GRIGLAKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Piccinini v. Teachers Protective Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Carney v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- McCloskey v. New York Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.