Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1967No. Appeal, 141PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The refusal of motions for a judgment non obstante veredicto or, in the alternative, a new trial in an as*420sumpsit action based upon a life insurance policy is challenged on this appeal.

Important to a determination of one phase of this appeal, a recital of certain facts is necessary.

Jarman Lynch (Lynch), 21 years of age and with a very limited educational background, in the early part of 1958 noticed a “fullness in his right testicle”. On August 25, 1958, he consulted a doctor who referred him to the University of Pennsylvania Surgical Clinic which he attended, first…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Nyce v. MuffleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Shafer v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Board of Public Education v. WatsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Brandon v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Banas v. Matthews International Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Metts v. GRIGLAKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Piccinini v. Teachers Protective Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Carney v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. McCloskey v. New York Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API