Legal Opinion
Wagner v. Anzon, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 6, 1996No. 1822PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHILLER, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying appellants’ 1 post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial, and allowing entry of judgment on the verdict for appellee. We affirm.
FACTS:
Appellee, NL Industries, and its successor, Anzon, Inc., operated a lead processing plant located at 2545 Aramingo Avenue in the City of Philadelphia beginning in 1906. Appellee operated the plant from 1960 to 1979; Anzon, Inc. and its successors have operated the plant since October 1979. 2 Appellants are a class composed of individuals, firms and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of the Army of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Mest v. Cabot Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Arch v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Schemberg v. SmicherkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Ettinger v. Triangle-Pacific Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.