Legal Opinion

Charlton v. Toyota Industrial Equipment

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1998PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOYCE, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order of the trial court denying Appellant’s post-trial motions, as made final by the entry of judgment in favor of Appellant in this products liability action. 1 For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. Before addressing the merits of Appellant’s claims, we will briefly recount the pertinent facts giving rise to this appeal.

Appellant, Michael Charlton, and his father, Edward Charlton were both employees of Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (CCS). On February 11, 1991, Michael approached his father, who was operating a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Kiser v. SchulteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Kimco Development Corp. v. Michael D'S Carpet Outlets & Laramie Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Spino v. John S. Tilley Ladder Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Bennyhoff v. PappertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Anne K. Wilson Oliver J. Larmi v. Vermont Castings, Inc. Vci Acquisition Co. PacificorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API