Howard v. Farrar
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from■ Choctaw County Court; W. T. Glenn, Judge. Action by W. E. Farrar, administrator of Etta Thompson, against W. H. Howard and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.
This action was brought in the court below by defendant in error to recover on two certain promissory notes, executed by plaintiffs in error. Plaintiffs in error, hereafter called defendants, in their answer set up three defenses: First. General denial. Second. Payment. Third. That the notes were based upon an illegal consideration and made in violation of the law and against public policy. Their answer was unverified, and therefore was ineffective for the purpose of denying the execution of the notes. The notes were executed on September 24, 1908,' by defendant Rhoda Howard as principal and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Milbank v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Puls v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Robertson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Barger v. FarnhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Lyts v. KeeveyWashington Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Maroney v. TannehillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. HolidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Tirey v. DarnealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- McManus v. FultonMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Mann v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.