Worrell v. Fellows
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Garfield, County; Dan Huett, Judge. Action by J. H. Fellows against Ollie L. Worrell and Squire Worrell, to recover damages for breach of contract. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
The brief of plaintiffs in error does not comply with the requirements of rule 25 of this court (38 Okla. x, 95 Pac. viii), in that it contains no abstract or abridgment of the transcript, setting forth the material part of the .pleadings, proceedings, facts, and documents upon which plaintiffs in error rely, together with such other statements, from the record as are necessary to a full understanding of the questions presented to this court for decision, so that examination of the record itself need not be made by this court. Neither does the brief contain any…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Eddy v. WeaverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Board of Comrs. of Washita Co. v. HubbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Board of Commissioners v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Hill v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Wagner v. Sattley Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- James v. UNKNOWN TRUSTEES, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- James v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- City of Lawton v. HillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Renfrow v. IttlesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Ingraham v. ByersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.