Ingraham v. Byers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Mayes County; J. E, Bristow, Judge. Action by Beal Ingraham against S. A. Byers, Judgment fur the defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
This was an action in replevin prosecuted for the purpose of trying the title and the right to the possession to two certain mules of the value of $125 each. The plaintiff claimed to be the owner of the mules. The defendant claimed title through purchase at a judicial sale upon execution issued on a judgment in his favor and against Hugh Ingraham and G.A. Ingraham. There was a trial to the court and a jury, and verdict for the defendant, upon which judgment was rendered, adjudging title and the right to possession to the mules to be in the defendant, and against the plaintiff for costs. From…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Doorley v. Buford & George Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Garland v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Lewis v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. CrowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Lockwood Bros. v. Frisco Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mangum Electric Co. v. BorderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Mountcastle v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Ragan v. ShannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Wherry v. LuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- National Oil & Development Co. v. Keystone Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923