Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Wright

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1899PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error from the District Court of Canadian County; before John C. Tarsney, District Judge. Action by F. H. Wright against the board of rcounty commissioners of- D county. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Hainer, J.:

This case comes here on appeal from the-district court of Canadian county, on what purports to-be a case-made. It appears from the record that F. H.. Wright, the defendant in error, recovered a judgment against the board of county (-commissioners of D county for $932.72, in a suit upon county warrants. The board of county commissioners of D county, defendant in the-court below, in its answer ¡to the plaintiff’s petition, set up as a defense, that the warrants sued upon wereviod, because at the time the debts were incurred and the warrants issued, «they…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eddy v. WeaverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Brown v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  3. Sanford v. WeeksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. Wilson v. WilleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895
  5. Alexander v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Davidson v. GregorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. NathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. New Life Pentecostal Church of JenksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Ouellette v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. De Vitt v. City of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API