State v. Cullen
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by CATHERINE STONE, Justice.
In this interlocutory appeal brought by the State, we are asked to hold that the State is effectively denied its right to appeal a pre-trial order granting a defendant’s motion to suppress if the trial court refuses the State’s request for findings of fact and conclusions of law following its ruling. The State contends that in the absence of findings and conclusions, the trial court’s ruling is insulated from meaningful review, thereby undermining the legislative grant of the State’s right to appeal an adverse ruling on a suppression motion. Because…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- State v. Rivenburgh, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
- State v. Guo, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CullenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- State v. Cullen, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
- State of Texas v. Cullen, ChristopherCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- State v. Cullen, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
- State v. Cullen, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007