Legal Opinion

State v. Cullen

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided May 18, 2005No. 04-04-00583-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by CATHERINE STONE, Justice.

In this interlocutory appeal brought by the State, we are asked to hold that the State is effectively denied its right to appeal a pre-trial order granting a defendant’s motion to suppress if the trial court refuses the State’s request for findings of fact and conclusions of law following its ruling. The State contends that in the absence of findings and conclusions, the trial court’s ruling is insulated from meaningful review, thereby undermining the legislative grant of the State’s right to appeal an adverse ruling on a suppression motion. Because…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. State v. Rivenburgh, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  4. State v. Guo, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CullenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. State v. Cullen, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
  3. State of Texas v. Cullen, ChristopherCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. State v. Cullen, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
  5. State v. Cullen, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API