State v. Rivenburgh
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
RICKHOFF, Justice.
The State of Texas appeals from the trial court’s order granting a motion to suppress. In two points of error, the State contends the trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress because: (1) the arresting officer observed appellant commit the offense of disorderly conduct thereby justifying the stop; and (2) the arresting officer observed appellant commit a traffic offense thereby justifying the stop. We affirm the trial court’s suppression order.
FACTS
Appellee, Robyn Rivenburgh (“Riven-burgh”), was arrested for driving while intoxicated after being stopped by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- DuBose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Duran v. Furr's Supermarkets, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Johnnie Faye Spiller v. City of Texas City, Police Department State of Texas Mark Spurgeon City of Texas CityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- State v. Dixon, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- State v. Fecci, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- State v. Guo, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
- Butler v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.