Legal Opinion

State v. Rivenburgh

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided October 9, 1996No. 04-96-00246-CRPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICKHOFF, Justice.

The State of Texas appeals from the trial court’s order granting a motion to suppress. In two points of error, the State contends the trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress because: (1) the arresting officer observed appellant commit the offense of disorderly conduct thereby justifying the stop; and (2) the arresting officer observed appellant commit a traffic offense thereby justifying the stop. We affirm the trial court’s suppression order.

FACTS

Appellee, Robyn Rivenburgh (“Riven-burgh”), was arrested for driving while intoxicated after being stopped by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. DuBose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Duran v. Furr's Supermarkets, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Johnnie Faye Spiller v. City of Texas City, Police Department State of Texas Mark Spurgeon City of Texas CityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. State v. Dixon, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  3. State v. Fecci, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  4. State v. Guo, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  5. Butler v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API