Legal Opinion

People v. Howard

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1997No. S058197PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

When the trial court in a criminal case decides at time of sentencing to grant the defendant probation, the court may either suspend imposition of sentence or actually impose sentence but suspend its execution. (See Pen. Code, § 1203.1, subd. (a).)1 If the court has suspended imposition of sentence and later revokes the defendant’s probation, then the court has undisputed authority to choose from all the initially available sentencing options. (§ 1203.2, subd. (c).) If instead the court actually imposes sentence but suspends its execution on granting probation, and the sentence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Stephens v. ToomeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. Tyrell J.California Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. People v. SeguraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. ManceboCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. People v. TurrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API