Legal Opinion

People v. Scott

California Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1996No. S048572PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

A jury convicted defendants Damien Scott and Derrick Brown of various crimes for their part in a drive-by shooting which resulted in the death of one person and injury to several others. We must decide in this case whether the doctrine of transferred intent may be used to assign criminal liability to a defendant who kills an unintended victim when the defendant is also prosecuted for the attempted murder of an intended victim.

Under the classic formulation of California’s common law doctrine of transferred intent, a defendant who shoots with the intent to kill a certain person…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gladden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. People v. BrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. SuticCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. SuesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. BlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API