Legal Opinion
Hoyt Investment Co. v. Bloomington Commerce & Trade Center Associates
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 22, 1988No. C5-86-2131PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
On petition of Bloomington Commerce and Trade Center Associates, a partnership between individuals William O. Cooley and Arthur J. Petrie, we granted further review of an order of the court of appeals which granted respondent Hoyt Investment Company’s petition for extraordinary relief and directed the trial court to enter judgment in favor of Hoyt in accordance with the court of appeals’ earlier opinion in Hoyt Investment Company v. Bloomington Commerce and Trade Center Associates, 390 N.W.2d 325 (Minn.App.1986), petition for further review denied September 24, 1986. We affirm.
*174W…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Mattson v. Underwriters at Lloyds of LondonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Arndt v. American Family Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Ford v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- ACTON CONST. CO., INC. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Day Masonry v. Independent School District 347Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Peterson v. BASF Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Costilla v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.