Legal Opinion
Acton Construction Co. v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 18, 1986No. CX-85-1854PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
Acton Construction Company sued the State of Minnesota, seeking recovery of $26,694.68 in additional expenses under a contract for construction of a bridge. The trial court ordered that Acton could not recover additional expenses because there had been an accord and satisfaction. Judgment was entered in favor of the State on June 7, 1984. Acton appealed.
This court reversed on the issue of accord and satisfaction. Acton Construction Co. v. State, 363 N.W.2d 130 (Minn.Ct.App.1985).
On remand, the trial court found that Acton acquired implicit authority to incur additional…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roske v. IlykanyicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Summit Court, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- ACTON CONST. CO., INC. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Mjolsness v. MjolsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- Schumacher v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Dahl v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Zinter v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Overka v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.