Legal Opinion
Smart Smw of Ny v. Zoning Com'n, Town of Stratford
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 17, 1998No. 3:97 CV 1292(GLG)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d) and 42 U.S.C. § 1988, Smart SMR of New York, Inc., d/b/a Nextel Communications (“Nextel”) has filed an application for attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $40,444.52, which includes $85,347.00 in legal fees, $3,097.52 in costs, and $2,000.00 for the preparation of the fee application. For the reasons discussed below, we award fees and’costs in the amount of $9,411.93.
In an opinion dated February 17, 1998 (document # 20), this Court partially granted summary judgment in Nextel’s favor. The relevant portion of the opinion…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission of WallinfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Pascuiti v. New York YankeesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Pazik v. Gateway Regional School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Tsombanidis v. City of West Haven, ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of WallingfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.