Legal Opinion

Tsombanidis v. City of West Haven, Connecticut

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided June 18, 2002No. 3:98CV01316(GLG)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

GOETTEL, District Judge.

Following this Court’s finding that plaintiffs are prevailing parties entitled to an award, of fees and costs against the City of West Haven and the First Fire District of the City of West Haven, plaintiffs have submitted their application for attorneys’ fees in the amount of $262,622.01, and costs in the amount of $20,102.48 [Doc. ## 150, 155, 167, 176, 178]. 1 Pursuant to this Court’s directive that plaintiffs allocate their fees and costs between the two defendants, plaintiffs have asked that the Court…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tsombanidis v. West Haven Fire DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. O Centro Espirita Beneficente União Do Vegs in U.S. v. DukeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
  3. McInnis v. Town of WestonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
  4. Sony Electronics, Inc. v. Soundview Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  5. Connecticut State Department of Social Services v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API