Legal Opinion

Pazik v. Gateway Regional School District

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 30, 2001No. Civ.A. 00-30078-MAPPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PONSOR, District Judge.

Upon de novo review this Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted, without objection. The plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is allowed, and the defendant’s motion is denied. The clerk will enter judgment for plaintiffs in the amount of $13,491.58.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO THE PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

The predominant issue presented by the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, which have been referred to the court for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  5. Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. System Management, Inc. v. LoiselleDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  2. Bd. of Educ. of Frederick County v. IS Ex Rel. SummersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  3. Pearl Murphy, Theodore Murphy v. Arlington Central School District Board of Education, No. 03-7850-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Gross Ex Rel. Gross v. Perrysburg Exempted Village School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
  5. Neosho R-V School District v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API