Legal Opinion

Holt v. Gambill

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 14, 2004No. 21329-3-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

Under the Mandatory Arbitration Rules (MAR), a party to a mandatory arbitration may file a request for trial de novo with the superior court clerk within 20 days after the arbitration award is filed. MAR 7.1(a). This 20-day period may not be extended. MAR 7.1(a). RCW 36.18.016(24) provides that a fee “established by authority of local ordinance must be charged” for filing a request for trial de novo of an arbitration award. Spokane County has not established a fee for filing a MAR 7.1 request for trial de novo.

David Holt1 and Charles Gambill2 entered into arbitration. Mr. Holt filed a request…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Carpenter v. ElwayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Simmerly v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ochoa AG Unlimited, L.L.C. v. DelanoyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  2. Amanda Butler, V. James FinneranCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
  3. SPLATTSTOESSER v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. Splattstoesser v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API