Legal Opinion
Schlotfeld v. Mel's Heating and Air Conditioning
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided September 22, 1989No. 88-1009PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.
Mel’s Heating and Air Conditioning appeals from the award of the Workers’ Compensation Court on rehearing finding that the accident which occurred while appellee Harry A. Schlotfeld was employed by appellant was the sole and proximate cause of Schlotfeld’s disability and determining to extend the period that Schlotfeld was temporarily totally disabled. Schlotfeld cross-appeals from the compensation court’s award excluding certain fringe benefits from calculation of the average weekly wage upon which his compensation award is based.
On May 27, 1986, Schlotfeld was employed by Mel’s as an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ex Parte MurraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Hite v. Evart Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Sidel v. Travelers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
- Mulder v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Spangler v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Antillon v. New Mexico State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Briggs v. Consolidated FreightwaysNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Tabor v. Levi Strauss & Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
- Mutual of Omaha v. BroussardNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.