Legal Opinion

Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 24, 1983No. 81-1891PublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger

The question presented is whether employer contributions to union trust funds for health and welfare, pensions, and training are “wages” for the purpose of computing compensation benefits under § 2(13) of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 44 Stat. (part 2) 1425, 33 U. S. C. § 902(13) (Compensation Act).

I

James Hilyer, an employee of petitioner Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co., was fatally injured while working on the construction of the District of Columbia Metrorail System. At the time of his death, Hilyer was covered by the District of Columbia Workmen’s Compensation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States Ex Rel. Sherman v. Carter Constr. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. Embassy Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. JW Bateson Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Bd. of Trustees of Nat. Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Traynor v. TurnageSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API