State v. Rust
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Askren, J., entered April 29,1921, upon a trial and conviction of practicing medicine without a license.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
— The appellant, Claude D. Eust, was informed against in the superior court of Pierce county for the crime of practicing optometry, on or about January 16, 1921, without first obtaining a certificate of registration or other permit from the state hoard of examiners and filing the same with the county clerk, he not being a regularly qualified oculist or physician who is regularly licensed to practice medicine in this state, and more especially did practice optometry by displaying an advertisement in the Tacoma Sunday Ledger setting himself forth as an eye specialist. A copy of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. GordonIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- In Re RustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. BonhamWashington Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by8 opinions
- Woodson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. LydonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Waldo v. PoeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
- State ex rel. Finch v. EustaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Walker v. DeanWashington Supreme Court · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.