State ex rel. Finch v. Eustace

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff commenced this action to obtain a judgment declaring that those licensed to practice osteopathy under the laws of this state cannot under such license practice optometry without a certificate of registration as an optometrist. Judgment-was rendered for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

The action was tried on an agreed statement of facts which showed than on October 15, 1912, the defendant obtained from the State Medical Board of Examination and Registration a certificate authorizing him to practice osteopathy in the…