Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Waldo v. Poe

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 28, 1926No. 10731PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks by original mandamus to compel his registration as a surgeon pursuant to the pro*750visions of the “Harrison Narcotic Act,” as amended. He states that he was licensed under the laws of the state of Washington to practice osteopathy in 1910, and in 1919 he was licensed to practice surgery; that at all times since admission to practice he has been registered by the Internal Revenue Department pursuant to the provisions of law, and qualified to procure for administration narcotic drugs; that he is actively engaged in the practice of osteopathy and in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. HagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Nix v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. State v. BonhamWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. People ex rel. Gage v. SimanIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Graham v. Equity Nat. Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Bruer v. WoodworthDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1927
  4. Amchanitzky v. SinnottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  5. Consumers' Lignite Co. v. Lumberman's Mut. Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API