Legal Opinion

State v. Cephus

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1955No. 75PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Only three assignments of error require discussion. Defendant’s Exception No. 7 relates to the refusal of the court to have the jury polled. In order to determine whether the verdict of the jury is unanimous, it is the right of every defendant to have the jury polled. S. v. Young, 77 N.C. 498; S. v. Boger, 202 N.C. 702, 163 S.E. 877. However, this right must be exercised at the time the jury returns its verdict or before the jury is discharged, otherwise the right is deemed to have been waived. S. v. Toole, 106 N.C. 736, 11 S.E. 168. In this case no request was made for a poll of the jury at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . TooleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. State v. . YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  3. State v. . BogerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. State v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. . CogdaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Armando A. Miranda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
  2. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. SummrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. InglandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. BestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API