Legal Opinion

State v. . Cogdale

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1946PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.

In the record the appellant makes fourteen assignments of error, but in his brief he sets out only eleven exceptions, the remain- iug three exceptions in the record are therefore taken as abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N. C., 562 (563).

The first exception set out in appellant’s brief is Exception 17, which relates to the action of the court in overruling the defendant’s motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit lodged when the State had introduced its evidence and rested its case, which motion was renewed at the close of all the evidence and likewise…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. . StancillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. State v. . EppsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. State v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. BillupsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. ShoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API