Legal Opinion

State v. . Boger

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 11, 1932PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOK, J.

The right of a defendant in a criminal action tried in a court of this State, to have the jurors polled by the judge or under his direction, when a request for such poll is made in apt time, after an adverse verdict has been returned by the jurors, was recognized by this Court in S. v. Young, 77 N. C., 498. In that case it was said: “We think a defendant on trial in a criminal case (and of course the solicitor for the State) has the right to have the jury polled, whether it be an oral or a sealed verdict. He has no right to say in what manner it shall be done, nor to propound any question,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  2. Lipscomb v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. In Re SuggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. In re Will of SuggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Joseph C. Frady v. United States of America, Richard A. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. VaszorichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  4. State v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. CephusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API