Legal Opinion

State v. Ingland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1971No. 83PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial judge to define reasonable doubt. In the absence of a request, such a charge is not required. State v. Potts, 266 N.C. 117, 145 S.E. 2d 307 (1965); State v. Browder, 252 N.C. 35, 112 S.E. 2d 728 (1960); State v. Lee, 248 N.C. 327, 103 S.E. 2d 295 (1958) ; State v. Hammonds, 241 N.C. 226, 85 S.E. 2d 133 (1954). It is the better practice, however, to do so and “seems to be well nigh the universal practice of our trial judges. ...” State v. Hammonds, supra.

Defendant next assigns as error the failure of the judge to charge the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. LowrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
  5. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Nimmo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API