State v. Breckenridge
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DALY, J.
The defendant, Richard Breckenridge, appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-321 *492and committing Mm to the custody of the commissioner of correction for a period of five years. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) deMed his motion for a continuance and (2) concluded that sufficient evidence exists to support its finding of a violation of probation. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to our resolution of the defendant’s appeal. The defendant was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Payne v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Payne v. RobinsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. YoungsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Morant v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. DurantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. HinesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. CarcareConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.