Legal Opinion
Payne v. Robinson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 24, 1988No. 13177PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
We granted certification of the petitioner’s appeal from the Appellate Court to consider the following issue: Under what circumstances, if any, *567does the exclusionary rule of the fourth amendment apply to probation revocation hearings? The petitioner, Frederick Payne, sought a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that the revocation of his probation violated due process. After the trial court’s denial of his petition, the petitioner appealed to the Appellate Court, which upheld the trial court’s decision. Payne v. Robinson, 10 Conn. App. 395, 523 A.2d 917 (1987).
The record discloses the following…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Summerville v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Valeriano v. BronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.