Meyers v. St. Bernard's Congregation
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
The plaintiffs first contend that they are entitled to recover damages because the injuries sustained by Mrs. Garity were the result of a violation of the safe-place statute as contained in ch. 101, Stats. They contend that the stairs and the concourse are an integral part of the church, particularly because of the elevation of the church above the sidewalk level. In the alternative they contend that the concourse and steps are a separate structure within the meaning of the safe-place statute. They cite sec. 101.01 (12), Stats., wherein the term “public building” is defined to “include any…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bent v. JonetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Smith v. Congregation of St. RoseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Baldwin v. St. Peter's CongregationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Lawver v. Joint District No. 1Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Feirn v. Village of Shorewood HillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ball v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Harnett v. St. Mary's CongregationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Hintz v. Zion Evangelical United Brethren ChurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Buckley v. Park Building Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Weiss v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.