Legal Opinion
Ball v. City of Madison
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 1957PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.
In our opinion this case is largely ruled by Cegelski v. Green Bay (1939), 231 Wis. 89, 93, 285 N. W. 343, where this court held:
“. . . the instant [toboggan] slide was in no sense a building or a structure. The slide followed the natural slope of the hill. The only allegation of the complaint having any relation to anything other than mere smoothing and keeping smooth and covered with ice or snow the surface of the ground and banking the sides of the course with snow is that the city ‘erected on said premises a wooden railing to guide the direction of the skis or toboggans’ using the slide.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bent v. JonetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Baldwin v. St. Peter's CongregationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Cegelski v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Lawver v. Joint District No. 1Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Hoepner v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schwenn v. Loraine Hotel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Copeland v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Gilson v. Drees Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Rogers v. City of OconomowocWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.