Legal Opinion

Weiss v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, C. J.

It is appellant’s (city of Milwaukee) contention that the steps described in the foregoing statement of facts do not constitute a “structure” as that term is used to define “public building” in sec. 101.01 (12), Stats., and that therefore the safe-place statute does not apply to this case. Sec. 101.06 requires every owner of á public building to “so construct, repair, or maintain” it as to render the same safe; and sec. 101.01 (12) defines the term “public building” as meaning “any structure used in whole or in part as a place of resort, assemblage, lodging, trade, traffic, occupancy, or use…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bent v. JonetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Feirn v. Village of Shorewood HillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Meyers v. St. Bernard's CongregationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Moore v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harnett v. St. Mary's CongregationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Rogers v. City of OconomowocWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Hintz v. Zion Evangelical United Brethren ChurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API