Smith v. Congregation of St. Rose
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
This court has repeatedly held that charitable and religious corporations are not liable for the negligent acts of their employees or agents. Morrison v. Henke (1917), 165 Wis. 166, 160 N. W. 173; Bachman v. Young Women’s Christian Asso. (1922), 179 Wis. 178, 191 N. W. 751, 30 A. L. R. 448; Schumacher v. Evangelical Deaconess Society (1935), 218 Wis. 169, 260 N. W. 476; Baldwin v. St. Peter’s Congregation (1953), 264 Wis. 626, 60 N. W. (2d) 349. The learned trial judge in his memorandum opinion in the instant case acknowledges that this rule of immunity would prevent plaintiff from recovering…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Harper v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Hughes v. City of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Leahan v. CochranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Morrison v. HenkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Kojis v. Doctors HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Muller v. Nebraska Methodist HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Widell v. Holy Trinity Catholic ChurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.