Legal Opinion
Township of Saddle Brook v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 16, 2012No. 10-213CPublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The issue for decision is whether plaintiff has alleged the existence of an implied-in-fact contract between a municipality and the New York District of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) whereby the Corps promised to undertake a flood-control project along the Saddle River. Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
1. Background
The following facts are undisputed.1 The Township of Saddle Brook (“plaintiff”) is a…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Diamond v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Jeun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Stanwyck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Alston-Bullock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Xp Vehicles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.