Legal Opinion
Veazey Drug Co. v. Fleming
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 16, 1941No. 723PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHT, District Judge.
In this action the plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment defining the rights of certain of its employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. c. 8, §§ 201-219.
The purpose of this Act is to regulate wages and hours of employment by employees engaged in interstate commerce and under section 213 it specifically exempts “any employee engaged in any retail or service establishment the greater part of whose selling or servicing is in intrastate commerce.”
The defendants, Philip Fleming, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, United States Department…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Walling v. Goldblatt Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Walling v. Consumers Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- Walling v. L. Wiemann Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Wirtz v. Keystone Readers Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Stansfield v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.