Legal Opinion
Stansfield v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 11, 1941No. 9930PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
The suit was brought under Sec. 21, Longshoremen and Harbor Workmen’s Compensation Act,1 against Shepperd, the deputy commissioner, and against the claimant to set aside a second award of date, February 1, 1941, modifying and increasing by 10%, the award of 15% permanent partial disability, the commissioner had made June 6, 1939. The claim was; that by the terms of the Act the first award became final 30 days thereafter and could not be changed or amended except (1) “on the ground of a change in conditions,” or (2) “because of a mistake in a determination of fact by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1939
- Veazey Drug Co. v. FlemingDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941
- Gravel Products Corporation v. McManigalDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
- Clyde-Mallory Lines v. CardilloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
3Cited by15 opinions
- Oliver W. Eifler v. Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Peabody Coal Company, and Old Republic Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Hall v. Seaboard Maritime CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Power v. Joseph G. Moretti, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Sauder v. Coast Cities Coaches, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1963
- Fischback & Moore of Alaska, Inc. v. LynnAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.