Caldwell v. Overall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
Plaintiff, Overall, brought this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for work done as a carpenter on property owned by defendant. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
The sole question involved is whether the evidence was sufficient to show that defendant’s husband, who employed plaintiff to do the work, was defendant’s agent. We have carefully examined the record and are of the opinion that the agency of the husband is thereby sufficiently established. Without going into detail, it is sufficient to say that the facts and circumstances shown, as well as the admissions of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cordilla v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Whitfield v. Frensley Bros. Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Deka Development Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Swetnam v. HaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williamson v. WinninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- MacRis v. Sculptured Software, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- Capitol Electric Co. v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1950
- Capitol Electric Co. v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1950
- Okmulgee Real Estate Development Co. v. Muskogee Materials Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953